[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: retrograding with convert-ly
From: |
-Eluze |
Subject: |
Re: retrograding with convert-ly |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:51:12 -0700 (PDT) |
dak-3 wrote:
>
>
>
>> I don't think there is a bug here.
>
> Well, you reproduce the described behavior. No idea whether to call it
> a bug.
>
I don't think we should - most important is that the conversions happen!
the best we could do is to recommend to use the options -de - is it worth
it?
thanks
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/retrograding-with-convert-ly-tp34160943p34165569.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- retrograding with convert-ly, -Eluze, 2012/07/14
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, Colin Hall, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, -Eluze, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, Colin Hall, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly,
-Eluze <=
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, Graham Percival, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, -Eluze, 2012/07/16
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, -Eluze, 2012/07/17
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, Colin Hall, 2012/07/16