[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: broken clef glyph
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: broken clef glyph |
|
Date: |
Tue, 03 Sep 2013 11:56:12 +0200 (CEST) |
> If this bug of TeXlive will persist into stable GNU/Linux
> distributions, it will likely have a devastating effect on
> LilyPond's reputation. It's not just the clef glyph that is
> prominently broken, but also a number of other frequent glyphs like
> the flags.
Indeed. While I had reported the bug before releasing TexLive 2013,
IIRC, it was not possible to stop the release process (again).
I sincerely hope that both Debian and Fedora are going to use the
*current* TeXLive version (from the SVN).
Werner
- broken clef glyph, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken clef glyph, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken clef glyph, Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken clef glyph, David Kastrup, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken clef glyph,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: broken clef glyph, David Kastrup, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken clef glyph, James, 2013/09/03
- broken mpost binary from TeXLive (was: broken clef glyph), Werner LEMBERG, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive (was: broken clef glyph), Karl Berry, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, Alexander Kobel, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, Karl Berry, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive (was: broken clef glyph), Marek Klein, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, David Kastrup, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/09/04