Re: Proposing 2.18.1 -- feedback?

[Phil Holmes]

"David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote in message 
news:address@hidden
> Federico Bruni <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > 2014-02-15 19:56 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> >
> > > Ok, I've tried doing a reasonable collection of what should go
> > > into 2.18.1.  This does not contain significant documentation patches:
> > > the translation team would have no realistic chance to have a go at them
> > > _if_ we happen to release 2.18.1 this weekend.
> >
> > I marked two issues in the tracker as Backport_2_18 which are missing 
> > from
> > your list: #3601 and #2909 (see last comment)
>
> I'll leave it to you and Phil to shoot out 2909.  Since 3601 documents a
> 2.18.0 feature, it makes sense pulling it in.


For the 2.18 build, it's imperative to change the search box to 2.18: 
there's no debate about that, so I'll just do it.

--
Phil Holmes