[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: why are all engravers quoted?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: why are all engravers quoted? |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:21:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eluze <address@hidden> writes:
> my hiliter doesn't support hiliting keywords in quotes (or I don't know how
> to specify it)
>
> what's the risk of using the unquoted form:
>
> \remove Bar_engraver
>
> instead of
>
> \remove "Bar_engraver"
The CG
<URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/lilypond-formatting>
states:
All engravers should have double-quotes around them:
\consists "Spans_arpeggio_engraver"
LilyPond does not strictly require this, but it is a useful
convention to follow.
Apart from the bad engraver name here (it's Span_arpeggio_engraver),
this advice is rather old. It would appear to stem from
commit a545fc2d47d53b0124f796d45def240e5f3834ab
Author: Graham Percival <address@hidden>
Date: Sat Mar 29 07:48:35 2008 -0700
Update policy.
which would be 2.11.43.
Definitely preceding
<URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2702> in
2.15.43. Should that make a difference? No idea.
--
David Kastrup