[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: why are all engravers quoted?

From: Eluze
Subject: Re: why are all engravers quoted?
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:45:45 -0800 (PST)

David Kastrup wrote
> Eluze <

> eluzew@

> > writes:
>> my hiliter doesn't support hiliting keywords in quotes (or I don't know
>> how
>> to specify it)
>> what's the risk of using the unquoted form: 
>>   \remove Bar_engraver
>> instead of
>>   \remove "Bar_engraver"
> The CG
> <URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/lilypond-formatting>
> states:
>     All engravers should have double-quotes around them:
>         \consists "Spans_arpeggio_engraver"
>     LilyPond does not strictly require this, but it is a useful
>     convention to follow.
> Apart from the bad engraver name here (it's Span_arpeggio_engraver),
> this advice is rather old. Should that make a difference?  No idea.

so nothing withstands using the unquoted form - and the (missing) hiliting
would instantly reveal the bad engraver name.

thanks for these clarifying quotes!


View this message in context: 
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]