[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: why are all engravers quoted?
From: |
Eluze |
Subject: |
Re: why are all engravers quoted? |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:45:45 -0800 (PST) |
David Kastrup wrote
> Eluze <
> eluzew@
> > writes:
>
>> my hiliter doesn't support hiliting keywords in quotes (or I don't know
>> how
>> to specify it)
>>
>> what's the risk of using the unquoted form:
>>
>> \remove Bar_engraver
>>
>> instead of
>>
>> \remove "Bar_engraver"
>
> The CG
> <URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/lilypond-formatting>
> states:
>
> All engravers should have double-quotes around them:
>
> \consists "Spans_arpeggio_engraver"
>
> LilyPond does not strictly require this, but it is a useful
> convention to follow.
>
> Apart from the bad engraver name here (it's Span_arpeggio_engraver),
> this advice is rather old. Should that make a difference? No idea.
so nothing withstands using the unquoted form - and the (missing) hiliting
would instantly reveal the bad engraver name.
thanks for these clarifying quotes!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/why-are-all-engravers-quoted-tp159602p159618.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.