[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ghostscript problem in 2.19.18

From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: Ghostscript problem in 2.19.18
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:25:49 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0

Am 13.04.2015 um 16:47 schrieb Masamichi HOSODA:
gs: Interpreter revision (905) does not match gs_init.ps revision
lilypond-2.19.18-1.linux-x86.sh includes gs-9.15.
However, lilypond seems to be invoking the external gs-9.05
instead of included gs-9.15.

My ubuntu 64 bit environment have been installed gs-9.10.
However, lilypond invokes included gs-9.15 instead of system's gs-9.10.
My ubuntu 32 bit environment have not been installed gs.


Compiling a file with  lilypond-2.19.18-1.linux-x86.sh ends with

Invoking `gs -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595.28 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=841.89 -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=./document.pdf -c.setpdfwrite -fdocument.ps'...

gs: Interpreter revision (905) does not match gs_init.ps revision (915).

warning: `(gs -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595.28 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=841.89 -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=./document.pdf -c.setpdfwrite -fdocument.ps)' failed (256)

while compiling with a self-built version ends with

Invoking `gs -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595.28 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=841.89 -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=./document.pdf -c.setpdfwrite -fdocument.ps'...

GPL Ghostscript 9.05 (2012-02-08)

Copyright (C) 2010 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved.

This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details.


Success: compilation successfully complete

Here we obviously call Ghostscript 9.05 also (which seems to be the "current" version on Debian stable) but without conflicting with "gs_init.ps".

So what is wrong here?
If it is simply an issue with my personal installation I'd consider ignoring it, but somehow this looks like an issue. So it would be good to have a confirmation that either I'm the only one experiencing it or not.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]