[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoBeaming and \set measurePosition
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: autoBeaming and \set measurePosition |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:48:05 +0100 |
Simon Albrecht wrote Thursday, August 20, 2015 1:11 AM
> I don’t quite know what I’m supposed to think of this: With 3/4, there
> is no beam between the third and fourth quavers. It doesn’t happen with
> -1/4, 0, 1/4, or 2/4. Doesn’t seem like this is going to appear in any
> realistic scenario. Just ignore it?
Automatic beams which are created using beamExceptions are
triggered when the beam end points are passed. Skipping the
end point like this means beam creation is not triggered.
I think just ignore it. If anyone wants to do this it's easy to add a manual
beam.
Trevor
- Re: autoBeaming and \set measurePosition, (continued)
- Re: autoBeaming and \set measurePosition, Phil Holmes, 2015/08/20
- Re: autoBeaming and \set measurePosition, Kevin Barry, 2015/08/20
- How to include code in e-mail? (was: Re: autoBeaming and \set measurePosition), Simon Albrecht, 2015/08/24
- Re: How to include code in e-mail?, David Kastrup, 2015/08/24
- Re: How to include code in e-mail?, Simon Albrecht, 2015/08/24
- Re: How to include code in e-mail?, David Kastrup, 2015/08/24
- Re: How to include code in e-mail?, Simon Albrecht, 2015/08/24
- Re: How to include code in e-mail?, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2015/08/25
Re: autoBeaming and \set measurePosition,
Trevor Daniels <=