[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Noteheads slightly too large
From: |
Gilberto Agostinho |
Subject: |
Re: Noteheads slightly too large |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:06:26 -0700 (MST) |
Hi Simon,
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
> You might try
> other backends (SVG, PNG), else the best way of testing is printing it
> on paper.
So I tried this:
#(set-global-staff-size 90)
{
c' d' e' f'
}
Then exported a png via Frescobaldi using resolution 1200 and in Publish
mode, and here is a crop of the result:
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n187042/test.png>
If you still judge that printing is necessary, I can try doing it next week
since I don't have a printer home.
Cheers,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Noteheads-slightly-too-large-tp184659p187042.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/08
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Gilberto Agostinho, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Urs Liska, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, tisimst, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Paul Morris, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Gilberto Agostinho, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, tisimst, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Paul Morris, 2016/02/10
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/10
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Paul Morris, 2016/02/14
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Andrew Bernard, 2016/02/09