Re: Skip should end lyric extender

[Knut Petersen]

> > Well, you might remember that there is code
> > <https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4509/> that improves
> > the current LyricExtender syntax.
> Uh no, it doesn't?  It _removes_ the current LyricExtender syntax, then
> tries to do the right thing by itself.
>
> Interpreting user input sensibly and ignoring user input altogether are
> not the same thing.
Yes, it removes the current LyricExtender syntax and automatically adds extenders where the notation standard requests extenders. But the user is free to override this behavior at any time. The patch also fixes some bugs (e.g. extenders should not extend under grace notes belonging to the next 
moment) and allows to force extenders at places where current lilypond simply is unable to generate extenders and requires the user to use the underscore character from the lyric font as a poor replacement ...

Knut