Re: svn 14407 broke the repository.

[Bernhard Fischer]

On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 05:36:45PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
>On Thursday 02 March 2006 3:51 pm, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:32:53PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
>> >On Thursday 02 March 2006 1:18 pm, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> >> >Not happy...

>> I *think* that i'm tripping a bug in "my" make-3.81b4 version.
>> Please reread the bug with-make-and-e2fsprogs mail ¹) or just apply
>> *and* *checkin* the attached alleged proper fix which will make
>> make-3.81b4 (from debian) go up in flames but will work four your
>> make-3.80...
>>
>> ¹) http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2006-March/018910.html
>
>Huh.  For some reason I don't seem to have gotten a copy of that message.  
>Weird.
>
>This patch does indeed fix it for me on ubuntu.
>
>Red Hat 9 still barfs on the line 247 of Makefile:
>$(foreach d,$(DIRS_UPPER),$(eval $(notdir $(d))-y:=))
>
>The error messages are things like:
>Makefile:247: /root/coreutils/libcoreutils/Makefile.in: No such file or 
>directory
>
>When the path the file is actually at would 
>be /root/busybox/coreutils/libcoreutils/Makefile.in

Looks like doesn't understand the $(notdir) there.
Can you please try to just drop that whole line? This would not
initialize the WHATEVER-y:= lists and may barf if we didn't initialize
them but just say WHATEVER-y+=whatever.c

>
>Rob
>
>(Oh, and make distclean isn't zapping libbusybox.*)
You'd have to have CONFIG_BUILD_LIBBUSYBOX (or however it's called) set.
Perhaps we should just blindly rm -f libbusybox.* ?