[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parted 1.2.14-pre3
|
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Parted 1.2.14-pre3 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 19:06:35 -0200 |
Glenn McGrath wrote:
> Why even bother with CHS at all, could we set them to all 1's which
> should mean they will be ignored.
>
> CHS are obsolete anyway (arent they?), why not just use LBA ?
>
> I was wonderign abotu this the other day, is there anything bad about
> havign a non-alighed partitiion that justifies even a warning ?
Well, CHS isn't really obsolete, because people still use it.
Also, there is the metadata allocation issue.
Andrew Clausen
Re: Parted 1.2.14-pre3, Glenn McGrath, 2000/12/20