[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New encodings in makeinfo
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: New encodings in makeinfo |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:14:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:18:33PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote:
> 00D8: O better than OE
> 00F8: o better than oe
>
> This seems wrong to me. Is OE different than AE? One would never write
> "Asop's Fables".
It's not for oe, but for Oslash. The AE of AEsope is AElig, 00C6, OE of
OEdipe is 0152 (OElig), and I agree with the transliteration to OE.
> 00C5: A better than AA
> 00E5: a better than aa
>
> I feel like I've seen AA and aa an awful lot, but maybe just as TeX
> control sequences :).
It is for Aring, A with a ring above, so I don't see why there should be
another A when transliterating. It goes against all the other examples.
> Although "TH" might be a better translation of the individual letter
> Thorn when used by itself, I surmise that "TH" would be really wrong
> when used at the beginning of an actual word, as in "THorn" (I don't
> know a real word :). So the mixed-case mappings seem preferable to me.
I agree that mixed case is better in most cases.
--
Pat