[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rethinking @def*
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: rethinking @def* |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:49:27 +0000 (UTC) |
> I agree that some users won't be happy with the changes in
> formatting. But, in that case, I think that this is less
> problematic than keeping unclear semantics and strange formatting as
> it is now.
I beg to differ, but now you know that already :-)
> Another possibility would be to change first the documentation,
> [...]
Hmm.
> But I do not think that the users will change anything before the
> formatting is actually changed anyway.
Exactly.
> We (I) could also propose too help and volunteer to change the
> manuals to accompany the change. Maybe advertise it on some GNU
> lists, in addition to the help-texinfo list.
While this shows good intentions, it certainly fails in the long run.
There are simply too many manuals in the wild, and not everybody
contacts the 'bug-texinfo' mailing list if problems appear. A more
likely outcome is that people will use such a backward incompatibility
as a welcome excuse to change their documentation system to something
'more modern'.
Werner
- rethinking @def*, Patrice Dumas, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/27