[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filter
From: |
felix . winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: filter |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2021 19:33:33 +0100 |
Hi, Jürgen!
> I suggest, to include a filter routine with two values, the sublist
> which passes the test and the sublist which fails at least into (chicken
> base) which is imported most of the time.
I think depending on SRFI-1 isn't that mauch hassle. On the other hand
we have fundamental operations like "foldl" in the core, simply because
it can be inlined. Adding a basic "filter" would probably acceptable,
inlined similarly, like "foldl"/"foldr".
felix
- filter, Juergen Lorenz, 2021/01/28
- Re: filter, Lassi Kortela, 2021/01/28
- Re: filter,
felix . winkelmann <=