[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes'
From: |
Dalibor Topic |
Subject: |
RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes' |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 01:56:56 -0800 (PST) |
--- Chris Gray <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2003, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> > Maybe we should just take the TeX approach and
> just converge to some
> > non-rational number like e, so we can say that we
> are now at version
> > 2.7182 :)
>
> Hm, I think e is already taken by LaTeX. What else
> is there? (Apart from i
> :>).
Are complex numbers allowed?
cheers,
dalibor topic
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Mark Wielaard, 2003/03/01
- RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Jeroen Frijters, 2003/03/02
- Re: Thoughts on 'reference classes', Archie Cobbs, 2003/03/03