Re: Branch for generics

[James Damour]

Tom Tromey wrote:
>
>  I propose we merge the branch to mainline when two criteria are met:
>
>  1. A majority of Classpath-using VM implementors agree that they
>  have access to a compiler suitable for compiling the branch.

Maybe you should pick an actual number instead of saying "majority";
otherwise people can claim that we aren't including **every**
Classpath-using VM in our count.  

Alternatively, you could just say "When the following Classpath-using VM
implementors agree that they have access to a compiler suitable for
compiling the branch: Kaffe, SableVM, GCJ, JikesRVM, JamVM, and
Kissme".  Modify the list to be whomever you want, but IMHO if these
guys can't use it then even if everyone else can, it isn't ready.

-- 
James Damour (Suvarov454) <address@hidden>

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part