Re: Generics Branch Status

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <address@hidden> writes:

Andrew> Yet there is still a body of code on the generics branch that goes in
Andrew> the latter category (the valueOf() functions in the primitive classes
Andrew> for instance).  Should this be merged across?

I think that is fine.

Andrew> And what is the general
Andrew> view on adding modified versions of some classes (e.g. Enum), as has
Andrew> been proposed, so as to give temporary, primarily run-time support?

This seems dangerous to me.  But I haven't really tried to think
through the ramifications.

Tom