Re: Eclipse broken with 0.16

[Thomas Zander]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 3 July 2005 07:02, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > ... but there are a whole load of related changes that I've been
> > applying over the last couple of days.
>
> I am sure there was.  But from a VM developer POV I must admit that as
> much as I would love to include the profitable changes that have been
> made in last days, still it would be hard for me to choose which ones
> they were and which of these are not too risky for a stable SableVM
> release :-)
>
> In other words, if you feel that some of other parts of your patches
> were also critically important (~bugfixes only), it would be great if
> you could send them as separate patches.  As Mark said, it's unlikely
> that VM devs would ship GNU Classpath unpatched, so this sounds like
> the right thing to do.  "We" (the VM devs) just need to know which
> patches we should apply :-)

Let me point to the option to create a stable-branch again, this kind of 
work is exactly what they are meant for.

- -- 
Thomas Zander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCx58uCojCW6H2z/QRAhVrAKDj+c5swpjvBU9rEXzgvGP9MNzzTQCaAw2h
jDYbDV5qY/vqjf+R9+bT4cU=
=Njaj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----