[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Classpathx-discuss] Testing Frameworks
From: |
cowboyd |
Subject: |
[Classpathx-discuss] Testing Frameworks |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:28:36 -0400 |
I think the answer is a clear "yes" in the case of JUnit (which is why I
use it for most of my development)
to summarize the reasons the answer is yes
-- no human judgement is required analyze test results
-- output is formatted consistently to avoid "scroll blindness"
-- because JUnit uses the composite pattern for its tests cases, it is easy
to incorporate pre-existing test cases into new ones.
-- provides facilities for setting up test fixtures to maintain a constant
environment across many test cases.
Charles
David Brownell
<address@hidden> To: Nic Ferrier
<address@hidden>,
Sent by: address@hidden
classpathx-discuss-adm cc:
address@hidden Subject: Re:
[Classpathx-discuss] Servlet API
06/07/2001 10:24 PM
> - are junit tests really better than main() with some test code?
Responses?
I've worked with test harnesses where the answer is a clear "yes",
because of report generation or other virtues. Dunno if that's so
for jUnit.
- dave
_______________________________________________
Classpathx-discuss mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpathx-discuss
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Classpathx-discuss] Testing Frameworks,
cowboyd <=