[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [jaxp] Ant or Maven build ?
From: |
Arnaud Vandyck |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [jaxp] Ant or Maven build ? |
Date: |
Sat, 01 May 2004 14:42:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Maarten Coene <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there are plans to include an Ant build.xml file or
> a Maven project.xml file ??
If you can include the compilation of the C source and javah without
problem, it'd be cool.
I do agree with having two build system possible. No problem with Ant, but
I'm not sure about Maven.
Cheers,
--
Arnaud Vandyck
I think it's a little fantastic to try to form a picture in people's
minds of the Debian archive administration team huddled over their
terminals, their faces lit only by a CRT with a little root shell
prompt and the command
"/project/org/ftp.debian.org/cabal/s3kr1t/nuke-non-free.pl" all keyed
in and ready to go, their fingers poised over the enter key, a sweat of
lustful anticipated beading on their upper lips."
-- Branden Robinson in
<address@hidden> discussing
his draft Social Contract amendment
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] [jaxp] Ant or Maven build ?,
Arnaud Vandyck <=