[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request for comments: CONS specification
|
From: |
Pierre THIERRY |
|
Subject: |
Re: Request for comments: CONS specification |
|
Date: |
Tue, 1 Jun 2004 00:48:17 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
> If we can reuse existing code, there's no need to reinvent the wheel.
Yes, but it will have to follow the specifications by 100%.
And if some parts of Cons are specified very precisely, writing the
corresponding code will be straightforward. If we could achieve
specifying alebrically some parts, these ones could nearly be written
automatically...
Quickly,
le Moine Fou
--
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Request for comments: CONS specification, (continued)
Re: Request for comments: CONS specification, Pierre THIERRY, 2004/05/27
RE: Request for comments: CONS specification, Søren Mou Jakobsen, 2004/05/30
Re: Request for comments: CONS specification, H. S. Teoh, 2004/05/31