[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss-gnuradio] BPDG not unanimous on modulators
From: |
Seth David Schoen |
Subject: |
[Discuss-gnuradio] BPDG not unanimous on modulators |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 15:35:15 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
It turns out that a CE industry representative objected:
> Many organizations (non-consumer) use modulators, for totally rational uses.
> In addition, several companies are considering using modulation as a method
> of redistribution of ATSC streams in the home.
> [...]
> Perhaps you achieve the same by requiring that modulators must pass through
> the Retransmission Control descriptor. In addition, all encoders must
> encode and pass the descriptor. So if a stream was demodulated and demuxed,
> then remuxed if necessary then demodulated, the descriptor would survive.
> And if a stream was to be encoded, the descriptor could not be stripped.
--
Seth David Schoen <address@hidden> | Reading is a right, not a feature!
http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/ | -- Kathryn Myronuk
http://vitanuova.loyalty.org/ |
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Discuss-gnuradio] BPDG not unanimous on modulators,
Seth David Schoen <=