discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FPGA source proposal


From: Matt Ettus
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FPGA source proposal
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:18:03 -0800
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201)

Clark,

Thanks for your suggestion.  I have implemented your changes.  Check out
the latest CVS.

Thanks,
Matt

Clark Pope wrote:
> I've been working with the usrp_std fpga design. By including/removing
> various circuits the device utilization ranges from 6% (no TX or RX) to
> 87% (full design). I propose that we add conditional compile macros to
> make it easier for custom fpga designs to select the circuits to be
> compiled. For example, some applications may be receive only or transmit
> only, others may not want to use the resources for the half band filter
> and so on.
> 
> Any way, attached is my usrp_std.v and rx_chain_hb.v. For example, I
> added this to usrp_std.v:
> 
> // Uncomment the following to include optional circuitry
> //`define DEBUG_OWNS_IO_PINS
> `define TX_ON
> `define RX_ON
> `define Dual_RX
> //Note: More conditional compile flags in rx_chain_hb.v
> 
> And then the entire receiver or transmitter can be compiled out to make
> room for custom circuits.
> 
> This makes the source a little harder to read but it:
> 
> 1. reduces the number of files being maintained, e.g. don't need
> rx_chain.v AND rx_chain_hb.v
> 2. makes it more likely that custom extensions remain backward compatible
> 
> Thanks,
> Clark
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
> FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]