Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] xG Technology

[David Bengtson]

Phil Karn has done a more recent analysis at 
http://www.ka9q.net/xmax.html . This matches with my personal analysis 
that it smells a bit like a reptile cage. They have been doing some more 
press releases through Mobile Radio Technology Mag, claiming they are 
close to a rollout.

Their claimed understanding of the spectral requirements of "single 
Cycle Modulation" don't match my understanding of the inverse 
requirement between time resolution and bandwidth (The faster you yank 
signals around, the more bandwidth you need).

Dave


Richard Clarke wrote:
> Interesting however have a read of the following old Register article:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/09/xmax/
>
> and
>
> http://www.ka9q.net/xmax_schwartz.html
>
> So, this appears to have been doing the rounds since mid 2005 but 
> apparently nothing concrete to show 2 years later.
>
> Difficult to find any articles more recent than 2005 on this 'technology'.
>
> Anyone else find anything more concrete or recent regarding this?
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> Charles Swiger wrote:
> > Apologies for general/off topicness, but does anybody have any
> > comments/opionion about these guys:
> >
> > http://www.xgtechnology.com/technology.asp
> >
> > Useful innovation or snake oil?
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > --Chuck
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> >
> >   
>
> =======================================================================
> This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
> addressee.  It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
> the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
> lost by reason of this transmission.
> If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
> apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
> other act on the email.
> Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
> altered or corrupted during transmission.
> =======================================================================
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio