discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.


From: Bob McGwier
Subject: RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:58:26 -0500

The intel graphics chip set and northbridge are power hungry.  I think the idea 
is optimize code for the 330 and not the peripherals with this ine

ARRL SDR Working Group Chair
Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC.
"And yes I said, yes I will Yes", Molly Bloom


-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 6:12 PM
To: address@hidden
Cc: Bob McGwier; address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

On Monday 29 December 2008 06:53:30 Bob McGwier wrote:
> I am running GnuRadio, SDRMAX, and  PowerSDR on my new Intel ATOM 330 
> MiniITX motherboard.  I had to put a firewire card in the single PCI slot.
> The integrated intel graphics are nice and spiffy (glxgears is at 800 
> fps if you turn off the desktop enhancements, no wiggly windows please).
>
>
>
> At 96000 PowerSDR is running under 15% CPU.  The ATOM burns EIGHT 
> watts and has dual hyperthread cores  (shows up as four processors in task 
> manager).

Unfortunately the 945 chipset eats ~20W - god knows why Intel lumbered the Atom 
with it :(

Toms Hardware (and others) did a test of the Atom vs an underclocked Athlon and 
the later won most of the tests

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Atom-Athlon-Efficient,1997-1.html

I think the Atom combo is cheaper and smaller though :)

--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - 
http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so 
many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]