discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Need info regarding USRP Front End protection/vul


From: Matt Ettus
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Need info regarding USRP Front End protection/vulnerability
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:23:06 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.1

On 01/27/2010 03:53 PM, William L. Bahn wrote:
We will be using the USRP in an environment where it will be engaged by
an Electronic Attack system capable of putting out about 40MW of EIRP in
the form of pulses that are on the order of 4ns (possibly longer) but
with very fast rise times on the order of 500ps. Our system will be
using just the simple vertical whip antennas sold by Ettus. We are
looking at using pretty much all of the Flex series of daughterboards
and possibly the XCVR2450 and WBX boards as well.

What I need to determine is what the maximum power is that can be
present at the antenna in order to avoid damaging the front end so that
we can determine the minimum range to the jammer during the exercise.

Thanks.


Wow... that's a lot of power. In any case, the parts are all spec'ed in terms of maximum CW input power, so you'll need to take into account center frequency, pulse width, duty cycle, duration of test, bandwidth of your filters, etc.

Based on the part datasheets, the absolute maximum input power for the RFX boards is -10dBm.

The chip in the XCVR2450 specs +10 dBm.

For the WBX it will depend on your gain setting. At maximum gain it will be -15 dBm, and at minimum gain it is about +15 or +20 dBm. If you remove the small granddaughterboard, you'll lose about 18 dB of gain but would have a higher safe input power of nearly a watt as long as you have the maximum attenuation set.

You can probably exceed these for brief periods, but I'm not sure, as I've never tried anything over -10dBm on any of these boards. Please let me know how this goes for you!

Matt





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]