|
From: | Marcus D. Leech |
Subject: | Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU radio |
Date: | Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:47:35 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 |
On 21/09/2011 11:34 AM, Andrew Rich wrote:
That depends entirely on the daughterboard you chose. Although most of them have noise figures in the 4-5dB range at maximum gain. If you're just interested in RX in the 1090MHz range, I'd suggest the DBS_RX2. Sensitivity is dominated by noise figure. If you need lower noise figures you'll have to put a band-specific LNA in front, which is what I do for radio astronomy.I was just looking at the N200 Do these hardware components have sensitivity figures ?
In an SDR, nearly-all the processing is done on the host computer, so you need a fastish computer. Overall compute requirementsI am interested in passive RADARI have been using a 1090 MHz receiver and a cheap digital OSCilloscope commaned under LINUX as a capture device.I guess that is sort of what the hardware and software of an SDR does ? My system is very slow
are roughly proportional to sample_rate * complexity-per-sample.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |