|
From: | Tom Rondeau |
Subject: | Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] CMake builds vs Autotools builds |
Date: | Tue, 6 Dec 2011 18:02:43 -0500 |
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tom Rondeau <address@hidden> wrote:On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Josh Blum <address@hidden> wrote:>> http://gnuradio.org/cgit/gnuradio.git/commit/?id=56fcd5f9b22af33976f9413d3a9d0aec41a7b556This was fixed a month ago. Just clean your install.
>>
>> -josh
>>
>>
>> Marcus, would you be up for trying that? The resulting la files do not
>> match what comes out of autotools. We don't know if they will work,
>> despite their differences, and it'd be good to know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
> Yeah, I'll give it a try tommorow evening sometime. Farking day job
> gets in the way of all the
> fun stuff :-(
>
http://gnuradio.org/redmine/issues/473
-joshI believe the problem is that he NEEDS the .la files for the gr-fcd compilation. So either the gr-fcd would have to be worked on to link a different way, or we would have to provide the .la files (and make sure they are correct).
Actually, gr-fcd can link against .so but apparently the autotools prefer .la if they are present.
I had issue with the cmake generated .la file a month ago and Josh suggested to disable generation of .la files, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2011-10/msg00512.html
Alex
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |