[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc
From: |
Paul Miller |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:53:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:59:45AM +0100, Martin Braun wrote:
> One way to remedy this might be GSoC. Developing a nice application,
I'm a little surprised by this discussion. I think GNU Radio is
positively amazing for prototyping, testing, and academic
purposes. I can't imagine making finished applications with it
though. Is that really what it's supposed to be for?
Seems like distribution alone would be a problem. You'd have to
get your python and boost libraries exactly right just to have a
chance.
Perhaps I'm crazy.
-Paul
--
If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming.
116 jumps, 48.6 minutes of freefall, 92.9 freefall miles.
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, (continued)
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, Ben Hilburn, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, Andrew Davis, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, Jens Elsner, 2012/02/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, Andrew Davis, 2012/02/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, Almohanad Fayez, 2012/02/17
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, Andrew Davis, 2012/02/17
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc, Tim Newman, 2012/02/19
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] "GNU Radio is crap" and GSoc,
Paul Miller <=