[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-lte vs gr::digital::ofdm*
From: |
Martin Braun |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-lte vs gr::digital::ofdm* |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:07:32 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
On 24.06.2015 08:48, Anderson, Douglas J. wrote:
> Lately I've been working with gr-lte and trying to use some of those
> blocks in my own application (not grc).
>
> I'm still in the learning phase about ofdm/lte, and I'm struggling with
> the lack of documentation or comments in gr-lte.
>
> I think I would prefer to use GNU Radio's built-in OFDM blocks for
> time/freq sync, CP removal, etc, and then lean on gr-lte blocks for
> decode/unpack operations.
>
> My question is, is that practical? gr-lte uses a flowgraph like:
>
> source -> cp-based timing sync -> lte PSS sync -> cp-based freq sync ->
> LTE SSS sync -> lte esimator -> decode stuff...
>
> Are the gr::digital::ofdm* blocks too generic to understand things like
> LTE's primary and secondary sync symbols?
Hi Doug,
that's a big part of it. However, another part was that Johannes was
writing gr-lte while the OFDM subsystem was still maturing. I'm sure at
this point we could achieve more synergy between the projects.
Johannes hopefully has more insight he can provide.
Cheers,
M