[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency off
From: |
Bastian Bloessl |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency offset |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Mar 2016 00:57:45 +0100 |
Hi,
> On 18 Mar 2016, at 20:01, tom x <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Maybe there is an implicit dependence on 4MHz, in the parameters set by the
> Clock Recovery block? I am not sure.
> If there's any other relevant info I can give, let me know.
The omega parameter of the MM Clock Recovery defines the samples per symbol
(here samples per chip). With a chip rate of 2Mcps and a sample rate of 4MHz,
it is currently set to 2. You will have to adjust this.
Best,
Bastian
- [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency offset, tom x, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency offset, Martin Braun, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency offset, tom x, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency offset, Martin Braun, 2016/03/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency offset, tom x, 2016/03/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency offset,
Bastian Bloessl <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency offset, tom x, 2016/03/19
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency offset, Bastian Bloessl, 2016/03/20
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency offset, tom x, 2016/03/22
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency offset, Bastian Bloessl, 2016/03/24
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] diminishing returns with increasing frequency offset, tom x, 2016/03/26