discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Flummoxed!


From: liverpudd
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Flummoxed!
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 20:56:36 +0100

Bastian

 

I set the sampling rate on the GRC block diagram on all three devices to 1Msps. When I vary the sample rate to either side of 1Msps by a few Ksps using the resampler, the audio output start to go higher/lower in frequency and I start to get ‘UaUaUa…’ errors as you would expect.

 

However, I have just had a search to see what the HackRF supports and it would appear to be 2Msps to 20Msps. That being the case, I fail to see why the audio output of gr-rds is OK if it was set to 2Mbps!

 

With regards the USRP1, there is no UHD ‘The hardware does not support the requested TX sample rate’ warning when I run the gr-rds so I am assuming that it does support 1Msps +/- any frequency errors in the master xtal clock.

 

Finally, I tried gr-rds with a cheaper RTL dongle device without the 0.5ppm TXCO (I think it had a 5ppm xtal) and that worked OK with the audio and the RDS decoded OK also.

 

Watch this space…………………

 

Regards

 

Alistair

 

 

>Hi,

> 

>On 09/25/2016 01:32 AM, Cinaed Simson wrote:

>> But as strange as this might sound, it almost appears as if the RDS

>> module is configured to use RTL dongle raw I/Q data pairs and not the

>> complex I/Q pairs used by the USRP and HackRF One?

> 

>I don't know the difference between raw I/Q and complex I/Q, but the module is supposed to work with >either source.

> 

>>> Next adjusted the 1Msps sample rate using a Polyphase Arbitrary

>>> Respampler.  Adjusted it from 1Msps to +/- 50Ksps in small increments.

>>> RTL dongle packed in the RDS decode a few Ksps either side of the

>>> nominal centre of 1Msps. No joy from the USRP or HackRF no matter

>>> what sample rate I set it to!!!

> 

>Maybe the better approach would be to check what sample rate is supported by the device, set the source to >that sample rate, and then resample accordingly.

> 

>Best,

>Bastian

 

 

 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]