|
From: | Skyvalakis Konstantinos |
Subject: | Re: Phase Synchronize 2 USRP N200 w/ SBX cards |
Date: | Sun, 13 Jun 2021 20:02:35 +0000 |
Phase *correction* is easy once you know what that correction should be. Just a complex multiply-const by
Complex(math.cos(angle-in-radians),math.sin(angle-in-radians))
Or the equivalent in complex exponential notation.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2021, at 1:52 PM, Skyvalakis Konstantinos <kskyvalakis@isc.tuc.gr> wrote:
Understandable. However, if you eventually hear anything about it please let me know.
Can I contact you again tomorrow for some questions I have about the phase correction block I need to make? (I mean through discuss-gnuradio)
Thank you very much.
On Jun 13, 2021 19:37, Marcus D Leech <patchvonbraun@gmail.com> wrote:
I haven’t heard fro R&D on it. Part of the problem is the N200 was designed over a decade ago, and the original engineering team have long since departed…
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2021, at 6:25 AM, Skyvalakis Konstantinos <kskyvalakis@isc.tuc.gr> wrote:
Hi Marcus and sorry for bothering you again, but I'd like to ask if you have any news regarding my problem.
Thank you.
On Jun 11, 2021 16:15, Skyvalakis Konstantinos <kskyvalakis@isc.tuc.gr> wrote:
Yes it kind of helps, because if I manage to apply a phase shifting/correction technique, then all 4 scenarios could produce sensible data.
I am trying to build a phase correction block now, that will compare the 2 received signals, to see which phase shift out of the possible 4, minimizes the absolute phase difference between the 2 channels.
After I figure out which phase offset is the correct one, out of all 4, then I can run the rest of my DoA application. It is a bit of a pain in the a**, but it will have to do in case it never gets fixed.
Let me know if you have any news from Ettus.
Thanks again.
From: Marcus D Leech <patchvonbraun@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 4:05 PM
To: Skyvalakis Konstantinos
Subject: Re: Phase Synchronize 2 USRP N200 w/ SBX cardsAlso does knowing that there are only 4 possible phase relationships help in your application at all? Like only one of the 4 possible phase assumptions can produce “sensible” data? Just a thought.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 11, 2021, at 9:03 AM, Marcus D Leech <patchvonbraun@gmail.com> wrote:
I am an Ettus support contractor. I have a direct channel to R&D so I will relay any insights I receive here since any such feedback would be generally useful.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 11, 2021, at 8:15 AM, Skyvalakis Konstantinos <kskyvalakis@isc.tuc.gr> wrote:
I also tried contacting Ettus Support but they are not replying to my e-mails.
I will try to implement the phase calibration for now.
Thank you for your effort.
From: Marcus D Leech <patchvonbraun@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 2:23 PM
To: Skyvalakis Konstantinos
Cc: Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Phase Synchronize 2 USRP N200 w/ SBX cardsI have a query in to Ettus R&D about possible causes.
But you might need, for now to do an initial phase Calibration when you start up.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 11, 2021, at 3:39 AM, Skyvalakis Konstantinos <kskyvalakis@isc.tuc.gr> wrote:
I repeated the experiments once again today and I got once again the same results. I still keep on randomly getting these 4 cases I attached on a previous message.
I observed that cases 1.png and 3.png have a phase difference of +/- 180 degrees
and cases 2.png and 4.png also have a phase difference of +/- 180 degrees.
Do you reckon you could help me any further with my problem? I really need to achieve this synchronization for my thesis.
Thank you very much.
From: Discuss-gnuradio <discuss-gnuradio-bounces+kskyvalakis=isc.tuc.gr@gnu.org> on behalf of Skyvalakis Konstantinos <kskyvalakis@isc.tuc.gr>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 12:39 AM
To: Marcus D. Leech
Cc: Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Phase Synchronize 2 USRP N200 w/ SBX cardsExactly my thoughts as well, I mean regarding the phase ambiguity of the WBX daughterboards, from what I've read on the Ettus website.
I am 100% sure the daughterboards are SBX.
On Jun 11, 2021 00:26, "Marcus D. Leech" <patchvonbraun@gmail.com> wrote:
On 06/10/2021 01:00 PM, Skyvalakis Konstantinos wrote:
You're sure that you have SBX cards and not WBX cards? Sorry for the apparently-stupid question, but the WBX uses almost theIn addition to my last message regarding the INTEGER_N tuning, I repeated the experiment multiple times. I even restarted the USRPs and the signal generator multiple times.
What I observed was, that there were only 4 different recurring phase offsets (Blue = RX2 of SBX1, Red = RX2 of SBX2).
I am attaching the 4 screenshots I captured.
Thank you so much for your help. I feel like we're getting there.
same hardware as the SBX, but uses a 2XLO mixer that has fixed phase ambiguity--which would look like what you have here.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |