[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH.
From: |
Chris B . Vetter |
Subject: |
Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH. |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 17:35:04 -0800 |
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:16:46 -0500
Tim Harrison <harrison@timharrison.com> wrote:
> Chris B.Vetter wrote:
> > As I said, I thought about that. Since GNUstep is (kindof) based on
> > Next/Openstep, and those had a Mach kernel with a BSD wrapped around,
> > my idea was to base something on xMach (Ian might love that ;-) or
> > even Darwin.
So many ideas, so little time. I wonder what I'm doing wrong exactly...
> As I say, keep an eye out... you might be relatively surprised what
> comes out of our little project, when we officially announce it. ;)
You kinda did by answering to the mailing-list ;-)
--
Chris
- Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Tim Harrison, 2002/02/27
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Stefan Urbanek, 2002/02/28
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Nicola Pero, 2002/02/28
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Jeff Teunissen, 2002/02/28
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Nicola Pero, 2002/02/28
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Tim Harrison, 2002/02/28
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Jeff Teunissen, 2002/02/28
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Tim Harrison, 2002/02/28
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Tim Harrison, 2002/02/28
Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH., Tim Harrison, 2002/02/28