[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Objective-C++?
From: |
Chris B. Vetter |
Subject: |
Re: Objective-C++? |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 08:48:44 -0700 |
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003 15:01:40 +0100
Nicolas Roard <nicolas@roard.com> wrote:
> On 2003-04-08 01:02:49 +0000 Chris B. Vetter <chrisv@web4inc.com>
> wrote:
[...]
> > Though I especially DON'T like that feature, as it makes reading the
> > source pretty confusing and may lead to sloppy programming, I use it
> > for debugging - you can do that already in plain ObjC.
> Not exactly ... since gcc 3.x supports ansi C99 (which permits
> effectively to declare your variable whatever you want), ObjC with a
My bad, I forgot to mention that, sorry.
> gcc 3.x works that way. What's very strange (to me) is that it let you
> declare your variable anywhere but in a loop !
All the more reason not to use it, as still a lot of people (have to)
use older versions of GCC that can/will not handle it.
--
Chris
- Re: Objective-C++?, (continued)
- Re: Objective-C++?, Josh Rendlesham, 2003/04/07
- Re: Objective-C++?, Peter Rasmussen, 2003/04/09
- Re: Objective-C++?, Michael Saure, 2003/04/16
- Re: Objective-C++?, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2003/04/07
- Re: Objective-C++?, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/04/07
- Re: Objective-C++?, David Relson, 2003/04/07
- Re: Objective-C++?, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/04/07
- Re: Objective-C++?, Nicolas Roard, 2003/04/08
- Re: Objective-C++?,
Chris B. Vetter <=
- Re: Objective-C++?, Helge Hess, 2003/04/08
- Re: Objective-C++?, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/04/08
- Message not available
- Re: Objective-C++?, Dirk Theisen, 2003/04/09
- Message not available
- Re: Objective-C++?, Dirk Theisen, 2003/04/09
- Re: Objective-C++?, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/04/09
- Re: Objective-C++?, Philip Mötteli, 2003/04/08