|
From: | David Ayers |
Subject: | Re: gnustep CVS |
Date: | Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:17:53 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 |
David Wetzel wrote:
Fabien VALLON wrote:David Wetzel (dave@turbocat.de) wrote:does someone know when the gnustep CVS is working again? Is there a reason why we use a big GNU server which is hosting so manyprojects? the main problem is that GNUstep is a GNU project....:) Can we create an alternate CVS (temporary). Maybye we can change of hosting too : http://alioth.debian.org/.savahna seems to not have involved since the sourceForge fork, gforge has.Maybe we should use our own CVS server and create the web tools we need with GSWeb. That would also proof the usability of GSWeb and gnustep base. And we would have a limited number of user accounts on the machine. I could provide a machine for a CVS server.
According to: http://savannah.gnu.org/statement.htmlit should be back shortly, so I don't think it be worth the trouble of doing a move now.
Maybe we should consider a backup alternative, but it would have to have at least equivalent security level, infrastructure and maintance resources. Once services are back, instead we maybe should look into how we can make savannah more dependable and figure out what the status of subversions for savannah is, as I /think/ they were aiming at moving from cvs to subversions anyway.
Cheers, David
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |