Re: test driven development for GNUstep

[Adam Fedor]

On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 09:24 AM, Kaelin Colclasure wrote:

> I can see that using Sen:te's OCUnit for testing Foundation is a 
> non-starter, since OCUnit itself depends on a working Foundation. (And 
> obviously, OCUnit has nothing like the framework for GUI backend 
> testing you're describing -- which I think is an ambitious project, 
> but with a huge potential payoff.) But might it make sense to 
> "sanction" OCUnit as the testing framework of choice for applications? 
> This would allow Alexander to focus on a suite tailored to testing the 
> core functionality and integrating smoothly with the build system. It 
> would also give a welcome nod to folks who work (or would like to 
> work) with both GNUstep and Cocoa, since OCUnit supports both.

Well, I certainly like OCUnit, but I don't want to force people to use 
it.  Perhaps we should make it possible to integrate it in 
ProjectCenter they way it is on MacOSX. But that's not something I have 
time to do.