|
From: | Eric Heintzmann |
Subject: | Re: [pkg-GNUstep-maintainers] Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian? |
Date: | Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:50:42 +0100 |
Eric Heintzmann wrote: ...snip...Jesus christ, do they give you any justification for WHY, or are they just getting off on issuing fatwas?Well, this solution doen't satisfy everyone and doesn't solve the naming problem on frameworks (like netclasses) and libs.netclasse.framework_version.deb ?Already refused (like addresses-framework and addressview-framework).
They just say:"As per recent discusions on debian-devel, the package name "addressview-framework" is
too generic and abuse of the shared resource, package namespace. The later may be controversial: the former should not be." Or are you the one who has refused it? No. I just try to colect opinions to solve this (ridiculous) issue. Eric
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |