[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pkg-GNUstep-maintainers] Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian?
From: |
Evan Prodromou |
Subject: |
Re: [pkg-GNUstep-maintainers] Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:15:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "EH" == Eric Heintzmann <eric@gnustep.fr.st> writes:
EH> In fact terminal could be used by virtual packages (For
EH> example Terminal.app, xterm, kterm could provide terminal
EH> virtual package) and /usr/bin/terminal could be used by debian
EH> alternative.
Could be, but won't. There's already a virtual package to do that
('x-terminal-emulator').
Anyways, on the naming front, for Debian, let's do this:
- GNUstep core packages (only!) are named 'gnustep-*'.
- Application package are named 'appname.app', since that's a
frequent term used in the *step world. (We often say
So Debian package 'terminal' becomes 'terminal.app'.
- Kits just keep their regular names, but with *-dev, *-dbg,
etc. like other shared libraries.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou
Email: evan@debian.org
Jabber: evan@jabber.debian.net
- Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian?, (continued)
- Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian?, Wolfgang Sourdeau, 2004/06/15
- Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian?, Michael Baehr, 2004/06/14
- Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian?, Wolfgang Sourdeau, 2004/06/15
- Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian?, Evan Prodromou, 2004/06/15
- Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian?, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2004/06/15
- Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian?, Evan Prodromou, 2004/06/15
Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian?, Fabien VALLON, 2004/06/14
Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian?, Eric Heintzmann, 2004/06/13
Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian?, Eric Heintzmann, 2004/06/19