Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in Debian?

[Eric Heintzmann]

On 2004-06-13 21:47:41 +0200 Alex Perez <aperez@student.santarosa.edu> 
wrote:

> Adam Fedor wrote:
>
> > On Jun 12, 2004, at 9:58 AM, Nicolas Roard wrote:
> >
> > > A better solution imho would be to add ".app" to GNUstep apps names 
> > > rather 
> > > than prefixing with gnustep- .
> >
> > It would be nice if it were consistent, and perhaps even more 
> > advertising 
> > for us, since people would see a bunch of packages with .app or -gs 
> > or 
> > something, and either wonder what they were of know they were 
> > GNUstep apps.
>
> Noting that I think this whole issue is ridiculous, I vote for .app 
> and not 
> gnustep- or gnustep-client or gs- or anything crazy like that.
If we choose .app , we need something else for framework (at least).

Eric
>