Re: GNUstep on the rise!

[reuss]

Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
> Quoting Chris Vetter <cbv@gmx.net>:
> 
> 
>>A few days ago I read an article mentioning, among other things, GNUstep and
>>how 'cool' (my choice of words) it would be if/when/whether 'these guys'
>>(ie. the developers of GNUstep) would decide to put GNUstep on top of their
>>OWN operating system instead of 'screwing around with existing systems
>>resulting in symlinks all over the place' (again, my choice of words) and
>>'imagine GNUstep on a Mach based kernel.'
>>
> 
> 
> This would, IMHO, be the biggest mistake possible: tying GNUstep to a 
> particular
> platform. I personally love that fact that I only have to write an app once 
> and
> then have it running with little porting effort on Linux, FreeBSD, Mac OS X,
> and even ugly, but spread M$ Windows.
> 
> Of course, I'm not against a GNUstep-only-system (hell, I already did it as my
> graduation work at high school, complete with a CD-based installer, integrated
> workspace, it's own package management, etc.), 
is it downloadable?

but care should be taken not to
> make it part of the core libraries.
> 
>  Saso
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
> 
>