Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration

[Helge Hess]

On Oct 13, 2005, at 10:18, MJ Ray wrote:
> The drawbacks of SVN remain:

It doesn't make sense to discuss generic 'drawbacks'. You need to make 
a comparison with the available options and can then decide what to go 
for.
Except of the hosting issue none of your points is a drawback over CVS 
and most of your points are far from being obvious drawbacks anyway.

> ..and that's all obvious before use.

Just like the gains are all obvious before use. So please ...


I think we are in a stage where two things need to be done:

a) prior any further discussion it must be determined where an Svn repo
   could be hosted

b) some kind of voting needs to take place:
   1) stick with CVS
   2) update to Subversion
   3) use GIT
   4) use Monotone
   5) use xyz

Greets,
  Helge
--
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
OpenGroupware.org