discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wondering if ~/GNUstep shouldn't be ~/.GNUstep (i.e. hidden..)


From: Fred Kiefer
Subject: Re: Wondering if ~/GNUstep shouldn't be ~/.GNUstep (i.e. hidden..)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:05:35 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0

The actual bug report is about the directory ~/GNUstep/Library being
created. Has anybody an idea, why and where we create this without
adding any files to it?

BTW: I also have empty directories ~/.GNUstep/Library/Services and
~/.GNUstep/Defaults on my computer. No idea where these are coming from
either.

Fred

Am 04.11.2014 um 21:47 schrieb Stefan:
> Personally, I think we should try to conform a little more to the 
> freedesktop.org XDG directory structure 
> (http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-0.6.html). In 
> particular, I think we should put defaults in ~/.config or $XDG_CONFIG_HOME 
> directory.
> 
> Now that GNUstep uses separate defaults files, we can just dump the files 
> directly there.
> 
> If this were the case, we could simple move the ~/GNUstep directory structure 
> to ~/ since it would only exist if somebody installed something to the HOME 
> domain.
> 
> Anyway, it's just a thought.
> 
> Stef
> 
> On November 4, 2014 2:06:00 PM CST, Gregory Casamento 
> <greg.casamento@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Revisiting something from WAAAAY in the past, I'm wondering if this
>> shouldn't be reconsidered....
>>
>> Given that we have people using tools on Linux such as this one...
>>
>> https://code.google.com/p/theunarchiver/
>>
>> WIth issues like this:
>>
>> https://code.google.com/p/theunarchiver/issues/detail?id=644
>>
>> Should we at least provide the option to hide the directory or,
>> possibly, make it hidden by default?   There's no real reason why it
>> needs to be exposed.  Any thoughts guys?
>>
>> GC
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]