dmca-activists
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[DMCA-Activists] (Obvious) Hoax: Metallica Sues Over Chord Sequence E -


From: Seth Johnson
Subject: [DMCA-Activists] (Obvious) Hoax: Metallica Sues Over Chord Sequence E - F
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:38:18 -0400

Ah, shoot.

I been had.

Apologies to all.

Header at www.scoopthis.com:  "Because if it's on the net, it must be true."

I feel just as stupid as I actually am, now.

Seth


Seth Johnson wrote:
> 
> So, when will the honest truth get through to these numbskulls?
> 
> Seth
> 
> > http://www.411mania.com/music/news/article.php?news_id=3586
> 
> Metallica Sues Band Over Usage Of E, F Chords
> 
> Posted By Mindy Turner (address@hidden) on 07.16.03
> 
> Just when you thought things couldn't get more bizarre.
> 
> According to MTV.com, Metallica are suing independant Canadian rockers
> Unfaith over what they call "unsanctioned usage of two chords [Metallica]
> have been using since 1982 : E and F."
> 
> "People are going to get on our case again for this, but try to see it from
> our point of view just once," stated drummer Lars Ulrich. He adds that
> they're not saying they own the two chords, individually - "that would be
> ridiculous" - just that in that specific order, people have grown to
> associate E, F with their music, and their continued usage in the same song
> causes "confusion, deception and mistake in the minds of the public."
> 
> You can read the whole surreal article here
> (http://www.scoopthis.com/411/met_uf/stc_met_uf_mtv.htm).
> 
> Metallica.com has issued an official statement on the subject here
> (http://www.scoopthis.com/411/met_uf/stc_met_uf.htm).
> 
> Credit: MTV.com, Metallica.com

-- 

DRM is Theft!  We are the Stakeholders!

New Yorkers for Fair Use
http://www.nyfairuse.org

[CC] Counter-copyright: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cc/cc.html

I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of
this incidentally recorded communication.  Original authorship should be
attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for
usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
exclusive rights.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]