[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]URIs
From: |
Matthias Rosenkranz |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]URIs |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 01:22:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 10:21:49AM -0700, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
> Speaking of URIs. Is there a way for URIs to use alternate naming
> schemes?... and not be locked to DNS's naming scheme?
If your spec says how to resolve your scheme, I think it's possible to
use alternatives.
> Also, aren't there URI formats for function calls? (I remember
> some project using them, and saying they were a part of the
> standard... although a more exotic part.) And wouldn't that
> format be useful for rls?
>
> Also, how does rls relate to XML-RPC, SOAP, etc. URIs can
> only be so long... so is there any plans to send more info
> outside the URI... like XML-RPC, SOAP, etc do?
RLS are just a way to specify the location and 'options' of a specific
DotGNU service. How these are transfered to the server, by using SOAP,
XML-RPC, whatever (most people seem to favour SOAP) isn't clear yet
(at least to me;) ).
Matthias
--
Matthias Rosenkranz http://m-rosenkranz.de/
/---- ++ ----\
| Send mail with subject 'get GPG-key' |
| Linux 2.4.7 on i686 - 1.06 1.05 1.00 2/54 515
- Re: [DotGNU]URIs,
Matthias Rosenkranz <=