[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]URIs
From: |
Barry Fitzgerald |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]URIs |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Aug 2001 12:00:46 -0400 |
Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 31 Jul 2001 14:49:55 +0200, Matthias Rosenkranz wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Take a look at the current spec for RLS (Resource Locator Strings):
> > http://www.dotgnu.org/spec/rls.htm . This is the proposed format of
> > DotGNU URIs.
>
> Speaking of URIs. Is there a way for URIs to use alternate naming
> schemes?... and not be locked to DNS's naming scheme?
>
> Also, aren't there URI formats for function calls? (I remember
> some project using them, and saying they were a part of the
> standard... although a more exotic part.) And wouldn't that
> format be useful for rls?
>
> Also, how does rls relate to XML-RPC, SOAP, etc. URIs can
> only be so long... so is there any plans to send more info
> outside the URI... like XML-RPC, SOAP, etc do?
>
> See ya
>
> Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Tokens could, ostensibly, be passed via POST or GET operations. Or, if
someone comes up with an equivalent passing protocol, then that could be
used as well.
-Barry
- Re: [DotGNU]URIs, Matthias Rosenkranz, 2001/08/01
- Re: [DotGNU]URIs,
Barry Fitzgerald <=