S11001001 wrote:
Mr. Sugar's mention of this was in the context of his complaint about the
development of _any_ special project file, XML or not. His original post
said:
...
I agree, I put his words in wrong context. He complained about any IDE, and
I tried to propose the way to "minimize damage" of IDEs, which is not the
same. My apology to Mr. Sugar.
I totally agree with him on this point; I would like to see a development
environment that only uses existing files; there seems to be enough
information
in existing build systems to build & coordinate a project, so why not rely
on
those files alone?
It would be nice, but I'm not sure if it is possible in general case. If we
could have standard, such things wouldn't be a problem. But standard should
have to enable emacs style changing of source files that belong to project.
And here we go in circles...
I'll investigate this story a bit deeper and I'll post my findings.
Greetings,
Tomislav
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
address@hidden
http://subscribe.dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers