Tomislav Sajdl wrote:
files, which is problem. What about idea to define in advance project
file
format for DotGNU? I would suggest it to be XML based. If we define
all tags
Mr. Sugar's mention of this was in the context of his complaint about
the development of _any_ special project file, XML or not. His
original post said:
<<When one talks about IDE's in general, what I have always wanted was
something that integrated well with existing tools and practices. Just
about every IDE I have ever seen insists on it's own specially formatted
"project file". What I would like is something that supports
autoconf/automake based build trees as we normally do them rather than a
foriegn project build format.>>
I totally agree with him on this point; I would like to see a
development environment that only uses existing files; there seems to
be enough information in existing build systems to build & coordinate
a project, so why not rely on those files alone?
The closest he got to any sort of project file, XML included, was the
mention of a /minimal/ project file that contained /minimal/ information.
Also, I would like to vote down the term 'IDE', as this implies a
single program? The GDE (graphical development environment project, as
I am calling it in the tasklist) will hopefully be quite different and
more tolerable by experienced developers than 'IDE's.