[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot)
From: |
David Sugar |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot) |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:23:29 -0500 (EST) |
The BSD license is certainly a free software license, although it does
nothing to protect or preserve the freedom it provides.
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, John wrote:
> Norbert Bollow wrote:
> > Given that the UDDI reference implementation is Free Software,
> > see http://sourceforge.net/projects/juddi/
>
> Juddi is not Free! It's open, but its not Free. It's BSD'd not GPL'd or
> LGPL'd.
>
> John Le'Brecage
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://subscribe.dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
>
>
- [DotGNU]Re: UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot), (continued)
- [DotGNU]Re: UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot), John, 2002/02/13
- Re: [DotGNU]UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot), John, 2002/02/13
- Re: [DotGNU]UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot), S11001001, 2002/02/13
- Re: [DotGNU]UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot), John, 2002/02/13
- Re: [DotGNU]UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot), Norbert Bollow, 2002/02/14
- Re: [DotGNU]UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot), David Sugar, 2002/02/14
- Re: [DotGNU]UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot), Richard Stallman, 2002/02/15
- Re: [DotGNU]UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot), David Sugar, 2002/02/16
- Re: [DotGNU]UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot), John, 2002/02/15
- Re: [DotGNU]UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot), John, 2002/02/15
- Re: [DotGNU]UDDI (was Re: Our blindspot),
David Sugar <=