Re: [DotGNU]VRS vs. SEE

[Bill Lance]

--- S11001001 <address@hidden> wrote:
> I know that VRS discussion has moved, but I was
> reading the project proposals 
> VRS section, and gained a much better grasp of it.
> If VRS is the opposite of 
> SEE (and is a superior solution to the same problem,
> from what I gather), is 
> the SEE/DEE project scrapped?
> 
> -- 


I see SEE/DEE and VRS as complementary.  The SEE/DEE
has somewhat different goals than VRS.

BTW: the VRS discussion has moved to:

http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrs-development

and the Current draft docs are at:

http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/VRS/



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com